Moderation of Priming by Goals: Feeling Entitled to Judge Increases Judged Usability of Evaluative Primes
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Vol. 36 (2) , 155-181
- https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1397
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- The role of applicability in the emergence of the overattribution bias.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996
- The affective priming effect: Automatic activation of evaluative information in memoryCognition and Emotion, 1994
- Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994
- Social judgeability: The impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994
- Social Cognition and Social PerceptionAnnual Review of Psychology, 1993
- Social Hypothesis Testing and the Role of ExpertisePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1989
- Expert—Novice Differences in Person Perception: Evidence of Experts' Sensitivities to the Organization of BehaviorSocial Cognition, 1989
- Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989
- On the automatic activation of attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Lay persons' sensitivity to statistical information: The case of high perceived applicability.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984