Size Anomalies in U.S. Bank Stock Returns
Preprint
- 1 January 2010
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
The largest commercial bank stocks, ranked by the total size of the balance sheet, have significantly lower risk-adjusted returns than small- and medium-sized bank stocks, even though large banks are significantly more levered. We uncover a size factor in the component of bank returns that is orthogonal to the standard risk factors, including small-minus-big, which has the right covariance with bank returns to explain the average risk-adjusted returns. This factor measures size-dependent exposure to bank-specific tail risk. These findings are consistent with the existence of government guarantees that protect shareholders of large banks, but not small banks, in disaster states.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Collective Moral Hazard, Maturity Mismatch, and Systemic BailoutsAmerican Economic Review, 2012
- Securitized banking and the run on repoPublished by Elsevier ,2011
- The Failure Mechanics of Dealer BanksJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2010
- How Much Would Banks Be Willing to Pay to Become 'Too-Big-to-Fail' and to Capture Other BenefitsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
- Too many to fail—An analysis of time-inconsistency in bank closure policiesPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- U.S. Banks, Crises, and Bailouts: From Mexico to LTCMAmerican Economic Review, 2000
- Market microstructure and asset pricing: On the compensation for illiquidity in stock returnsJournal of Financial Economics, 1996
- A Critique of Size-Related AnomaliesThe Review of Financial Studies, 1995
- Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bondsJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- The Effect of Interest Rate Changes on the Common Stock Returns of Financial InstitutionsThe Journal of Finance, 1984