Two-Sector Nonmonocentric Urban Land-Use Model with Variable Density
- 1 April 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Vol. 20 (4) , 477-488
- https://doi.org/10.1068/a200477
Abstract
A two-sector nonmonocentric urban land-use model with variable firms density of business is presented in this paper. This is an extension of the work by Ogawa and Fujita (1978). In this model, households supply labor to firms, and firms pay wages to workers. Firms interact with all others at equal probabilities in the city to produce economic agglomeration. Each firm occupies office space, and the construction cost of office buildings is a function to the power two of the density of firms. By use of these assumptions, together with the generalized notion of bid rent, an equilibrium urban land-use model is formulated. It is shown that three types of configuration exist in equilibrium, which depend on the different values of the parameters.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- CBD hypothesis and economies of agglomerationJournal of Economic Theory, 1982
- Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurationsRegional Science and Urban Economics, 1982
- EQUILIBRIUM LAND USE PATTERNS IN A NONMONOCENTRIC CITY*Journal of Regional Science, 1980
- Location of Firms within a Square Central Business DistrictJournal of Political Economy, 1977
- Optimum and Market Equilibrium in a Model of a City without a Predetermined CenterEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1977
- Spatial Equilibrium in the Dispersed CityPublished by Springer Nature ,1976
- Efficient Resource Allocation in a Multinucleated City With Intermediate GoodsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1974
- The Spatial Variation of Urban Population DensitiesGeographical Review, 1969
- URBAN POPULATION DENSITY PATTERNS: AN ALTERNATE EXPLANATIONCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes, 1967
- Location and Land UsePublished by Harvard University Press ,1964