Left Ventricular Size and Function and Heart Size in the Year Following Myocardial Infarction
- 1 August 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 50 (2) , 331-339
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.50.2.331
Abstract
Interrelationships among left ventricular (LV) size, LV function, and heart size were investigated in 49 patients studied 2-12 months after myocardial infarction. LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) and ejection fraction (EF) were determined by biplane ventriculography. Heart size was estimated from chest films by the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and cardiac volume (CV) methods. Ventricular function (i.e., EF) was related to chamber size (i.e., EDV), but the correlation coefficient was not high ( r = 0.74); thus, chamber size was not an accurate predictor of EF. Because of the close linear relation that exists between LV end-systolic volume and EDV ( r = 0.98), a hyperbola describes the relation between EF and EDV. In general, EF was depressed (2 , was 2 ), and was 150 ml/m 2 . Thus relatively small chamber size (2 ) was associated with a wide range in ventricular function, while large chamber size was associated with severe dysfunction (EF < 0.30). By either heart size method, cardiomegaly (CTR > 0.50 or CV > 540 ml/m 2 ) was not found consistently until EDV exceeded 150 ml/m 2 . Hence normal heart size was often associated with moderate EF depression (0.49-0.30), while cardiomegaly was often associated with severe dysfunction. Clinical heart failure (CHF) was usually accompanied by EF < 0.30, but chamber size ranged from 101 to 331 ml/m 2 . Primarily because of this variation in chamber size, both normal heart size and cardiomegaly were at times associated with CHF. The poor correlations of EF with CTR ( r = –0.43) and CV ( r = –0.52) preclude use of the heart size indices as accurate predictors of LV function. When the data were analyzed according to the presence or absence of cardiomegaly, the following generalizations could be made regardless of the heart size method used. Cardiomegaly was a reasonable indicator of postinfarction LV function, being associated with depressed function and often with CHF. However normal heart size was associated with either normal LV function, or commonly, with depressed function, often not clinically apparent.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Left Ventricular Compliance and Abnormally Contracting Segments in Postmyocardial Infarction PatientsChest, 1974
- CORONARY PROGNOSTIC INDEX FOR PREDICTING SURVIVAL AFTER RECOVERY FROM ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIONThe Lancet, 1970
- Heart size and ten-year survival after uncomplicated myocardial infarctionAmerican Heart Journal, 1969
- DECLARATION OF HELSINKIJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1967
- Usefulness and limitations of radiographic methods for determining left ventricular volumeThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1966
- Heart size and prognosis in myocardial infarctionAmerican Heart Journal, 1966
- Cardiac Mensuration by the Cardiac Volume MethodRadiology, 1965
- THE CARDIOTHORACIC RATIOThe Lancet Healthy Longevity, 1919