Access to Health Care and Equal Protection of the Law: The Need for a New Heightened Scrutiny
- 1 January 1986
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Journal of Law & Medicine
- Vol. 12 (3-4) , 345-380
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0098858800009722
Abstract
Proposals to reduce national expenditures for health care under Medicare and other programs raise questions about the limits on legislative power to distribute health care benefits. The constitutional guarantee of equal protection has been a weak source of protection for the sick, largely because they fail to qualify for special scrutiny under traditional equal protection analysis. Recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court suggest that the Justices seek a newer, more flexible approach to reviewing claims of unequal protection. This Article examines the application of the equal protection guarantee to health-related claims. It argues that traditional equal protection analysis is too rigid and newer rationality review too imprecise to provide just eligibility determinations. The Article concludes that courts should subject claims of unequal protection in the health care context to heightened scrutiny, as health care plays a special role in assuring equality of opportunity.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Private Insurance for Medicaid Recipients: The Texas ExperienceJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1987
- The Supreme Court, 1985 TermHarvard Law Review, 1986
- Beyond "Carolene Products"Harvard Law Review, 1985
- Competition and Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit: Musings on the Regulation/Competition DialogueJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1982
- The Empty Idea of EqualityHarvard Law Review, 1982
- Medical Care for Prisoners: The Evolution of a Civil RightMedicolegal News, 1981
- Competition and Cost ContainmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- The Supreme Court, 1976 TermHarvard Law Review, 1977
- The Supreme Court, 1971 TermHarvard Law Review, 1972