Where Is the “E” in MCH? The Need for an Evidence‐Based Approach in Safe Motherhood
- 2 January 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
- Vol. 48 (1) , 10-18
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1526-9523(02)00369-0
Abstract
Measuring the impact of obstetric interventions on maternal mortality and/or morbidity is especially difficult in developing countries, where most maternal deaths occur. Therefore, program planning has been based on theory rather than proved effectiveness. After reviewing both the strategies that have been promoted to reduce maternal mortality and the adequacy of existing evidence used to justify their selection, the investigators highlight reasons why rigorous criteria for the selection and evaluation of interventions should be adopted. Adequate evaluation of intervention effectiveness under real-life conditions in developing countries is an efficient way to identify interventions for large-scale program replication and could speed progress in reducing maternal deaths.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Life of the mind: The interface of psychopharmaceuticals, domestic economies, and social abandonmentAmerican Ethnologist, 2004
- Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in contextPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Now or never: the case for measuring maternal mortalityThe Lancet, 2002
- Racial Disparity in Pregnancy-related Mortality Associated with Livebirth: Can Established Risk Factors Explain It?American Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
- Maternal Mortality in Vietnam in 199495Studies in Family Planning, 1999
- Effect on mortality of community-based maternity-care programme in rural BangladeshThe Lancet, 1991
- Outcomes of Care in Birth CentersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Measuring the impact of health interventions on mortality in developing countries: why bother?Journal of Biosocial Science, 1989
- Measuring maternal mortality: sense and sensitivityHealth Policy and Planning, 1987