A Different Way to Estimate the Equity Premium (for CAPM and One-Factor Model Use Only)
- 24 December 2007
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
In a one-factor model, such as the CAPM, it takes two assets to pin down the expected rates of return on every other asset in the economy. The risk-free rate is one. The market is traditionally the second. However, this numeraire can be switched to other assets. If we use long-term Treasuries, and believe earlier empirical evidence in Fama-Bliss (1987) that the long-term yield spread is entirely due to a risk premium and not at all due to a forecast of future yields, then the Treasury yield spread and the market-beta of the long-term Treasury pin down an estimate of the equity premium. For the period from 1962 to 2007, it was 8 er year.However, this method also fails often, specifically in times when the market beta estimate of the long-term Treasury is close to zero. Moreover, given that the CAPM performs so poorly, the author recommends using the resulting estimate only as an internally consistent estimate within the context of the model itself.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comprehensive Look at The Empirical Performance of Equity Premium PredictionThe Review of Financial Studies, 2007
- On estimating the expected return on the market: An exploratory investigationPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- The term structure of very short-term rates: New evidence for the expectations hypothesisJournal of Financial Economics, 2000
- Views of Financial Economists on the Equity Premium and on Professional ControversiesThe Journal of Business, 2000
- Global Stock Markets in the Twentieth CenturyThe Journal of Finance, 1999
- Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market EfficiencyThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- The Cross-Section of Expected Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- The equity premium: A puzzleJournal of Monetary Economics, 1985