Reaping the Benefits of Collaboration While Avoiding its Pitfalls: Marie Curie's Rise to Scientific Prominence
- 1 May 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Social Studies of Science
- Vol. 23 (2) , 301-323
- https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023002003
Abstract
Popular (and even some scholarly) interpretations of Marie Curie suggest that she was a scientific drudge or, alternatively, that she was the chemist of the Curie research team, whereas Pierre Curie was the physicist. Against this background, this paper explains how, despite her gender, Curie established a scientific reputation that led to Nobel Prizes in physics (1903) and chemistry (1911). The major thesis is that a key factor in Marie Curie's rise to prominence was the Curies' publication policy whereby they scrupulously claimed credit for their individual as well as joint contributions to radioactivity. By 1902, not only had the Curies published a series of significant joint papers, but Marie Curie (usually writing under the name of Mme Sklodowska Curie) had independently published key results in both the physics and chemistry of radioactivity. Her independent publications, in particular, helped assure her early prominence in the French scientific community, as well as belated public recognition from Ernest Rutherford.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: