Injustice, empowerment, and facilitation in conflict
- 1 May 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Interactions
- Vol. 13 (3) , 263-280
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03050628708434678
Abstract
The paper is divided into three parts. In the first section the idea of empowerment is outlined as a doctrine of mediation. The conditions under which it might be successful are outlined. In the second section an underlying assumption of the doctrine is challenged, that because conflicts are asymmetrical empowerment becomes proper practice. The argument is that all conflicts are both asymmetrical and symmetrical. In the third part, it is demonstrated that empowerment will involve the practitioners in certain contradictions. In section 4, an alternative is advanced, facilitation, which has many benefits not enjoyed by empowerment. Among these benefits are the maintenance of contact and a decreased likelihood of making the situation worse.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Empirical Table of Structural ViolenceJournal of Peace Research, 1976
- Policy Responsiveness to Protest-Group DemandsThe Journal of Politics, 1975
- Conflict, Power and Relative DeprivationAmerican Political Science Review, 1974
- Explanation of Political Violence: Some Psychological Theories Versus IndignationPolitics & Society, 1971
- Social Inequality — The Main IssuesJournal of Peace Research, 1971
- Rising expectations and political turmoil∗The Journal of Development Studies, 1969
- Psychological Factors in Civil ViolenceWorld Politics, 1968