How to use participatory action research in primary care.
Open Access
- 1 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Family Practice
- Vol. 20 (5) , 595-600
- https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmg518
Abstract
Objective. The aim of the article is to demonstrate the usefulness of participatory action research (PAR) in primary care. The author used PAR firstly to develop a deeper understanding of mutual participation in the doctor–patient encounter and secondly to apply this learning in a rural cross-cultural practice setting. Method. PAR was done with four patient groups. Four patients with terminal illnesses formed groups with their family members, neighbours and friends. Seven meetings were held with each group over a period of 6 months. The meetings were conducted in Tsonga, which is the local vernacular. All the meetings were audio-taped. The primary question for each meeting was how the group could work together to achieve the best possible health outcome for the patient. Additionally, the author, who facilitated the meetings, kept a reflective diary, including field notes over the research period. One member of each group kept a written record of each meeting. Three free attitude interviews were conducted with the author over the research period to elicit the development of his understanding about mutual participation in the doctor–patient encounter. The recorded meetings and interviews were transcribed and translated and themes subsequently identified using the transcripts. The reflective diary was analysed similarly. A model was constructed to depict the themes and their interrelatedness. The model was interpreted and conclusions were drawn. Results. The PAR process had a positive effect on the doctor–patient encounter. PAR greatly resembles a mutual participatory doctor–patient encounter. The research facilitator had certain basic tenets in order to facilitate participation. The patients who participated actively benefited most. Basic interviewing techniques were used to facilitate the mutual participation in PAR. Conclusions. PAR is very applicable in primary care. The principles of PAR such as mutual collaboration, reciprocal respect, co-learning and acting on results from the enquiry are essential in the doctor–patient relationship. Self-awareness, the ability to self-critique and reflect in a deep manner using such tools as a reflective diary are essential for nurturing the development of effective primary health care workers and consequently care structures for the patients and their families.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- 'Holding it lightly': the co-operative inquiry group: a method for developing educational materials.Medical Education, 2001
- Participatory research maximises community and lay involvementBMJ, 1999
- Organizing Community Research Partnerships in the Struggle against AIDSHealth Education & Behavior, 1999
- Participatory Action Research: Psychology and Social ChangeJournal of Social Issues, 1997
- Research in brief: Using participatory action researchRoeper Review, 1996
- Introduction to Community Empowerment, Participatory Education, and HealthHealth Education Quarterly, 1994
- Participatory action research from the inside: Community development practice in East St. LouisThe American Sociologist, 1993
- An Action Research Approach to Workplace Health: Integrating MethodsHealth Education Quarterly, 1992
- Participatory Action ResearchPublished by SAGE Publications ,1991
- Action ResearchPublished by Taylor & Francis ,1988