Assessing the Amount of Heterogeneity in Random‐Effects Meta‐Analysis
- 18 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Biometrical Journal
- Vol. 48 (2) , 271-285
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200510175
Abstract
In a random‐effects meta‐analysis, a new confidence interval for the heterogeneity parameter is proposed. With this interval, the amount of heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis can be assessed so that it can be judged whether the pooling of the estimates is meaningful. Through suitable corrections of the lower bound, based on the treatment effect measure of interest, the resulting interval yields satisfactory results with respect to the predefined confidence coefficient. Lower and upper bound of the interval can be used for one‐sided hypothesis testing on the amount of the underlying between‐trial variability.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- On confidence intervals for the among-group variance in the one-way random effects model with unequal error variancesJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2005
- A refined method for the meta‐analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcomeStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- On tests of the overall treatment effect in meta‐analysis with normally distributed responsesStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- An Alternative Method for Meta-AnalysisBiometrical Journal, 1999
- Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysisStatistics in Medicine, 1998
- INCORPORATING VARIABILITY IN ESTIMATES OF HETEROGENEITY IN THE RANDOM EFFECTS MODEL IN META-ANALYSISStatistics in Medicine, 1997
- A LIKELIHOOD APPROACH TO META-ANALYSIS WITH RANDOM EFFECTSStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- A random effects model for effect sizes.Psychological Bulletin, 1983
- Problems Arising in the Analysis of a Series of Similar ExperimentsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1937