Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Decomposition into Stock‐Picking Talent, Style, Transactions Costs, and Expenses
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 55 (4) , 1655-1695
- https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00263
Abstract
We use a new database to perform a comprehensive analysis of the mutual fund industry. We find that funds hold stocks that outperform the market by 1.3 percent per year, but their net returns underperform by one percent. Of the 2.3 percent difference between these results, 0.7 percent is due to the underperformance of nonstock holdings, whereas 1.6 percent is due to expenses and transactions costs. Thus, funds pick stocks well enough to cover their costs. Also, high‐turnover funds beat the Vanguard Index 500 fund on a net return basis. Our evidence supports the value of active mutual fund management.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Value of Active Mutual Fund Management: An Examination of the Stockholdings and Trades of Fund ManagersJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2000
- Investor flows and the assessed performance of open-end mutual fundsPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- Liquidity and stock returns: An alternative testJournal of Financial Markets, 1998
- Measuring Mutual Fund Performance with Characteristic‐Based BenchmarksThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- On Persistence in Mutual Fund PerformanceThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- Evidence on the Characteristics of Cross Sectional Variation in Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- Momentum StrategiesThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- Performance PersistenceThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bondsJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1992