Women's Advantage on Verbal Memory is Not Restricted to Concrete Words
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 91 (3_suppl) , 1137-1142
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2002.91.3f.1137
Abstract
It is well established that women perform better than men on tests of verbal memory, but the nature of this advantage is unclear. To examine whether reference to a real object is a factor, we presented several verbal memory tasks, including one containing words high and low in concreteness. Over all tests there was an expected female advantage. Although concrete words were recalled much better than abstract words, the female advantage was equivalent on both. The sex difference was not accounted for by a difference in verbal intelligence. Possible brain and adaptive mechanisms are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sex differences in episodic memory: The impact of verbal and visuospatial ability.Neuropsychology, 1999
- Sex Differences in Object Location MemoryBrain and Cognition, 1998
- Spatial Ability, Navigation Strategy, and Geographic Knowledge Among Men and WomenEvolution and Human Behavior, 1998
- Superior spatial memory of women: Stronger evidence for the gathering hypothesisEvolution and Human Behavior, 1997
- Role of the hippocampus in sex differences in verbal memory: Memory outcome following left anterior temporal lobectomy.Neuropsychology, 1997
- The Hunter-Gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arraysEthology and Sociobiology, 1994
- Sex differences in route-learningPersonality and Individual Differences, 1993
- "Paradoxical" sex differences in self-reported imagery.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1987
- Individual differences in cognitive abilities and brain organization: I. Sex and handedness differences in ability.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1983
- Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968