The Cross-National Validity of Party Identification: Great Britain and the United States Compared
- 1 September 1981
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Political Studies
- Vol. 29 (3) , 365-375
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1981.tb00502.x
Abstract
The question of party identification's cross-national validity revolves around the issue of whether or not it can be meaningfully distinguished from immediate voting preference in European national contexts. Comparing this relationship in the American and British party systems, however, this article demonstrates that the two forms of party support are behaviourally similar not in the case of national contexts, but of parties that are linked to the host society's cleavage structure. Moreover, it suggests that their behavioural similarity in the case of this type of party is a function of the ideological distance separating one from the other rather than of the two forms of party support tapping the same dimension of party loyalty. But, whatever the reason for the similarity, the conclusion cannot be avoided that party identification cannot serve the same range of powerful theoretical functions in Europe that it does in the United States because the former's party systems all reflect one or more long-standing, sometimes bitter, social divisions in the electorate.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Party Identification, Voting Preference and Electoral Outcomes in Britain, 1964–74British Journal of Political Science, 1979
- Political Issues and Liberal Support in the February 1974, British General ElectionPolitical Studies, 1977
- Beliefs, Feelings and Votes: The British CaseBritish Journal of Political Science, 1977
- Partisan Dealignment in Britain 1964–1974British Journal of Political Science, 1977
- Party Identification, Party Choice, and Voting Stability: The Weimar CaseAmerican Political Science Review, 1972
- Review Article: Election Studies of the Survey Research CenterBritish Journal of Political Science, 1971