Free radial forearm flapversuspectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction of oral and oropharyngeal defects: a cost analysis
- 20 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Otolaryngology
- Vol. 32 (4) , 275-282
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.2007.01466.x
Abstract
Objectives: The free radial forearm flap has replaced the pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap and it has become the ‘workhorse flap’ used by many head and neck reconstructive surgeons for soft tissue reconstructions. Cost implications of radial forearm flap reconstruction within the context of the overall health care in a particular system need to be investigated particularly before it is labelled as ‘costly only’.Design and Setting: Forty patients who underwent immediate free radial forearm flap reconstruction for oral or oropharyngeal soft tissue defects were matched with patients who underwent pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction for similar defects. The 2 years of which the overall management costs according to the hospital perspective were calculated were divided into four periods: operative period, the postoperative phase, follow‐up during first year and follow‐up during second year after discharge.Results: The total costs within the first 2 years were comparable at ∼50 000 euros. The lower costs of hospital admission (24 daysversus28 days;P = 0.005) in the postoperative phase outweighed the higher costs of the surgical procedure (692 minversus462 min;P < 0.005) in radial forearm flap patients when compared with pectoralis major flap patients.Conclusions: Oral and oropharyngeal reconstruction with radial forearm flap is not more costly than pectoralis major flap reconstruction. Given the better functional outcome and the present cost analysis, reconstruction of oral and oropharyngeal defects is preferably performed using free tissue transfer.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comorbid condition as a prognostic factor for complications in major surgery of the oral cavity and oropharynx with microvascular soft tissue reconstructionHead & Neck, 2003
- Functional Comparison after Reconstruction with a Radial Forearm Free Flap or a Pectoralis Major Flap for Cancer of the TongueOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 2003
- Free Tissue Transfer Versus Pedicled Flap in Head and Neck ReconstructionThe Laryngoscope, 2002
- The costs of head and neck oncology: primary tumours, recurrent tumours and long-term follow-upEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2001
- A Comparison of Resource Costs for Head and Neck Reconstruction with Free and Pectoralis Major FlapsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1997
- Economic analyses of clinical trials in cancer: Are they helpful to policy makers?The International Journal of Cell Cloning, 1994
- Intraoral soft tissue reconstruction after cancer ablation: A comparison of the pectoralis major flap and the free radial forearm flapThe American Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Cost analysis of microsurgical reconstruction in the head and neckJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1991
- The neurofasciocutaneous radial forearm flap in head and neck reconstruction: A preliminary reportThe Laryngoscope, 1990
- The radial forearm flap: a versatile method for intra-oral reconstructionBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1983