Ethics review roulette: what can we learn?
- 17 January 2004
- Vol. 328 (7432) , 121-122
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7432.121
Abstract
Footnotes Competing interests None declared.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recruitment failure in early neonatal researchArchives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 2004
- Variations in experience in obtaining local ethical approval for participation in a multi‐centre studyQJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 2003
- What are the effects of the fifth revision of the Declaration of Helsinki? Fair partnerships support ethical research Gains and losses for rights of consumer and research participants Research will be impeded Some clauses will hinder development of new drugs and vaccinesBMJ, 2001
- Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon geneticJournal of Medical Ethics, 2001
- Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process Commentary: Response from members of the Griffiths inquiryBMJ, 2000
- The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective studyBMJ, 2000
- Ethical Review of a Multicentre Study in Scotland: A Weighty Problem2000
- Local research ethics committeesBMJ, 1997