Effects of different fidelity measures and contexts on the determination of diagnostic species
- 23 February 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Vegetation Science
- Vol. 20 (1) , 130-137
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.05390.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Czech National Phytosociological DatabaseBiodiversity & Ecology, 2012
- Assessing species diagnostic value in large data sets: A comparison between phi‐coefficient and Ochiai indexJournal of Vegetation Science, 2008
- The basiphilous dry grasslands of shallow, skeletal soils (Alysso-Sedetalia) on the island of Oland (Sweden), in the context of North and Central EuropePhytocoenologia, 2006
- Formalized reproduction of an expert‐based phytosociological classification: A case study of subalpine tall‐forb vegetationJournal of Vegetation Science, 2003
- Plot sizes used for phytosociological sampling of European vegetationJournal of Vegetation Science, 2003
- Context-dependence of diagnostic species: A case study of the central european spruce forestsFolia geobotanica & phytotaxonomica, 2002
- Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measuresJournal of Vegetation Science, 2002
- A new measure of fidelity and its application to defining species groupsJournal of Vegetation Science, 2000
- Fidelity and character-species, a critical evaluationPlant Ecology, 1989
- PflanzensoziologiePublished by Springer Nature ,1964