Perturbative Calculation of Spin Observables in Nucleon-Deuteron Elastic Scattering. III. Comparison with an Exact Calculation
- 1 November 1973
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review C
- Vol. 8 (5) , 1702-1705
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.8.1702
Abstract
A previously presented perturbative calculation of elastic nucleon-deuteron scattering is compared with the exact calculation of Doleschall. It is found that the nucleon polarization in scattering is not accurately predicted by the perturbation theory but that the vector and tensor deuteron polarizations are in satisfactory agreement with the exact calculation. It is suggested that considerably more complicated potentials than those now in use will have to be employed to predict the nucleon polarization data at energies above 14 MeV. Some calculations of recently measured spin-transfer coefficients are presented and compared with the available data.
Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- A note on perturbation theory for three-particle scatteringPhysics Letters B, 1973
- A three-body calculation for polarization effects in neutron-deuteron scatteringNuclear Physics A, 1973
- Perturbative calculation of spin observables in nucleon-deuteron elastic scatteringNuclear Physics A, 1972
- Perturbative Calculation of Spin Observables in Nucleon-Deuteron Elastic Scattering. II. Inclusion of a Tensor ForcePhysical Review C, 1972
- Separable expansions and perturbation theory for three-body collisionsNuclear Physics A, 1972
- Vector and tensor polarizations in nucleon-deuteron scatteringNuclear Physics A, 1972
- Perturbation Theory in Three-Particle ScatteringPhysical Review C, 1972
- Two-Nucleon Interactions, the Unitary Model, and Polarization in Elastic Nucleon-Deuteron ScatteringPhysical Review C, 1972
- Reduction of the three-particle collision problem to multi-channel two-particle Lippmann-Schwinger equationsNuclear Physics B, 1967
- Calculations of Neutron-Deuteron ScatteringPhysical Review B, 1965