Coregulation of Starch Degradation and Dimorphism in the YeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
- Vol. 32 (5) , 405-435
- https://doi.org/10.3109/10409239709082675
Abstract
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the exemplar unicellular eukaryote, can only survive and proliferate in its natural habitats through constant adaptation within the constraints of a dynamic ecosystem. In every cell cycle of S. cerevisiae, there is a short period in the G1 phase of the cell cycle where “sensing” transpires; if a sufficient amount of fermentable sugars is available, the cells will initiate another round of vegetative cell division. When fermentable sugars become limiting, the yeast can execute the diauxic shift, where it reprograms its metabolism to utilize nonfermentable carbon sources. S. cerevisiae can also initiate the developmental program of pseudohyphal formation and invasive growth response, when essential nutrients become limiting. S. cerevisiae shares this growth form-switching ability with important pathogens such as the human pathogen, Candida albicans, and the corn smut pathogen Ustilago maydis. The pseudohyphal growth response of S. cerevisiae has mainly been implicated as a means for the yeast to search for nutrients. An important observation made was that starch-degrading S. cerevisiae strains have the added ability to form pseudohyphae and grow invasively into a starch-containing medium. More significantly, it was also shown that the STA1–3 genes encoding three glucoamylase isozymes responsible for starch hydrolysis in S. cerevisiae are coregulated with a gene, MUC1, essential for pseudohyphal and invasive growth. At least two putative transcriptional activators, Mss10p and Mss11p, are involved in this regulation. The Muc1p is a putative integral membrane-bound protein similar to mammalian mucin-like proteins that have been implicated in the ability of cancer cells to invade other tissues. This provided us with an excellent example of integrative control between nutrient sensing, signaling, and differential development.Keywords
This publication has 82 references indexed in Scilit:
- Glucose repression/derepression in budding yeast: SNF1 protein kinase is activated by phosphorylation under derepressing conditions, and this correlates with a high AMP:ATP ratioCurrent Biology, 1996
- Two glucose transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are glucose sensors that generate a signal for induction of gene expression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1996
- Fuse1 alcohols induce hyphal-like extensions and pseudohyphal formationin yeastsMicrobiology, 1996
- Irreversible formation of pseudohyphae by haploidSaccharomyces cerevisiaeFEMS Microbiology Letters, 1994
- Nutrient-induced activation of trehalase in nutrient-starved cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: cAMP is not involved as second messengerJournal of General Microbiology, 1992
- The promoter element GTACAAG of theSGAandSTA2genes is a possible target site for repression by theSTA10gene product fromSaccharomyces cerevisiaeFEMS Microbiology Letters, 1992
- Increased dosage of a transcriptional activator gene enhances iron-limited growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiaeJournal of General Microbiology, 1992
- Characterization and localization of the sporulation glucoamylase of Saccharomyces cerevisiaeBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology, 1989
- Similar short elements in the 5′ regions of the STA2 and SGA genes from Saccharomyces cerevisiaeFEBS Letters, 1988
- Regulation of cell type in yeast by the mating-type locusTrends in Biochemical Sciences, 1986