Approaches to the sellar and parasellar region: Anatomic comparison of the microscope versus endoscope

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Objective: Traditionally, surgical approaches to the sellar region require the use of the operating microscope. Over the past decade endoscopic surgery has gained much popularity because of advances in optics and illumination. Endoscopic surgery of the sellar region has been performed successfully. The goal of the present study was to quantify the amount of exposure to the sellar and suprasellar region that the endoscope provides versus the microscope, with three different anterior approaches to the sellar region. Methods: The transethmoidal, endonasal‐transsphenoidal, and sublabial‐transsphenoidal approaches were performed on 14 formalin‐fixed cadaver heads with a 0° endoscope and repeated with the operative microscope. The distances of relevant surgical landmarks and the amount of exposure superior and anterior to the dorsum sella, as well as the lateral exposure, were measured. The mean distances were then used to calculate the volume of exposure for each of the approaches. Results: It was found that the endoscope provided greater view than the operating microscope in all three approaches. The difference was statistically significant using a paired Student t test and a signed‐rank test (P < .001). Conclusion: The authors believe that endoscopic surgery of the sellar region can be performed safely and effectively, while providing the surgeon with a view that is superior to that afforded by the operating microscope