Definitions of depression: concordance and prediction of outcome
- 1 August 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychiatric Association Publishing in American Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 139 (8) , 1022-1027
- https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.139.8.1022
Abstract
Three methods of diagnosing and subdividing depressive illness were compared in terms of their ability to predict outcome. The Catego class D+ selected patients who continued to suffer from episodes of psychotic depression. The Research Diagnostic Criteria selected patients with schizoaffective depressions, whose outcome was completely different from that of patients with major depressive disorder. DSM-III [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-III] had advantages over the other systems, since it divided depression into 3 subtypes that differ from each other and from schizophrenia. Patients with a DSM-III diagnosis of mood-incongruent psychotic depression had persistent schizophrenic psychopathology, but their outcome differed from that of both schizophrenic and manic-depressive patients.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Identification of Disease Entities and the Relationship between Schizophrenic and Affective PsychosesThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1980
- "Schizoaffective disorder": an invalid diagnosis? A comparison of schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, and affective disorderAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1980
- Schizo-affective psychosis: definitions and incidencePsychological Medicine, 1979
- Definitions of schizophrenia: concordance and prediction of outcomePsychological Medicine, 1978
- Delusional Depressions: Natural History and Response to TreatmentThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1977
- Diagnostic Criteria for Use in Psychiatric ResearchArchives of General Psychiatry, 1972