Evolution and karyology of the amphibians
Open Access
- 1 January 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Bolletino di zoologia
- Vol. 47 (sup1) , 113-126
- https://doi.org/10.1080/11250008009438709
Abstract
The karyological characters differentiating the Amphibia from most other Vertebrates are the tendency toward genome hypertrophy, the occurrence of wide interspecific differences in nuclear DNA amounts and - in contrast - the relative conservativeness in karyotype morphology exhibited by the ‘higher’ families from the three orders. On examination of the more advanced Urodeles (Plethodontids and Salamandrids) these characters seem to represent the outcome of selective pressures tending on the one hand to favour the accumulation and speedy divergence of new DNA fractions, specifically the middle repetitive ones, and on the other to maintain or reduce the number of adaptive linkage-groups acquired through evolution. The primitive Urodela (Cryptobranchoidea) display only the first two of the above three characters. Their karyotypes are in fact widely variable in chromosome number and shape at the intergeneric and occasionally interspecific levels; the most prominent trend, from the karyological viewpoint, seems to be towards a progressive reduction in number of acrocentrics and microchromosomes. Evidence so far is lacking as to the presence of peculiar fractions of genomic DNA in the microchromosomes from these Urodeles. Karyological data on the Anura would favour recent hypotheses - put forward on the basis of studies of larval forms - which assign the role of ‘primitive’ to the Ascaphid-Discoglossid group alone. Conversely, other families of this order, sometimes included within the so-called Archaeobatrachia, have the same karyological characteristics as the higher Anura. Pipids, however, exhibit a complex situation in that the neotropical forms (Pipa) may have reduced the number of chromosome arms in parallel to other relict groups; on the other hand, the African forms (Hymenochirus and Xenopus) possess ‘higher’ karyotypes, and the latter genus seems to have largely adopted, for its own differentiation, polyploidization processes.Keywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cytotaxonomy of the Ranidae, Rhacophoridae, Hyperoliidae (Anura) from Madagascar with a note on the karyotype of two amphibians of the SeychellesGenetica, 1978
- Albumin Phylogeny for Clawed Frogs ( Xenopus )Science, 1977
- Repetitive DNA in Cichorieae (Compositae)Chromosoma, 1977
- Polyploid Amphibians: Three More Diploid-Tetraploid Cryptic Species of FrogsScience, 1976
- DNA reassociation kinetics in relation to genome size in four amphibian speciesChromosoma, 1976
- Chromosomal analysis of twelve species of Microhylidae (Anura) from MadagascarGenetica, 1976
- Localisation of satellite DNA in the microchromosomes of the Japanese quail by in situ hybridizationChromosoma, 1972
- Genome size in mammalsChromosoma, 1972
- Gene Regulation for Higher Cells: A TheoryScience, 1969
- Repeated Sequences in DNAScience, 1968