Laparoscopy in the “Normal” Infertile Patient: A Question Revisited
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
- Vol. 7 (3) , 317-324
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60473-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Observer variability in the diagnosis and management of the hysterosalpingogramFertility and Sterility, 1997
- Reproducibility of the interpretation of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathologyHuman Reproduction, 1996
- Use of algorithmic pathways to develop quality, cost-effective clinical careThe Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 1995
- Intra-observer and inter-observer variability in scoring laparoscopic diagnosis of pelvic adhesionsHuman Reproduction, 1995
- Chlamydia trachomatis antibody titers and hysterosalpingography in predicting tubal disease in infertility patientsFertility and Sterility, 1994
- A meta-analysis of the therapeutic role of oil soluble contrast media at hysterosalpingography: a surprising result?Fertility and Sterility, 1994
- The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesionsFertility and Sterility, 1988
- Reevaluation of Hysterosalpingography in Infertility InvestigationObstetrics & Gynecology, 1986
- Revised American Fertility Society Classification of Endometriosis: 1985Fertility and Sterility, 1985
- A Comparison of the Results of Hysterosalpingography and Laparoscopy in the Diagnosis of Fallopian Tube DysfunctionFertility and Sterility, 1972