A Call for Randomized Controlled Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty
- 1 October 1988
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 4 (4) , 497-510
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462300007583
Abstract
A rapidly evolving technology, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, is increasingly favored over bypass surgery for treating some types of coronary stenosis because of its less traumatic invasion, better recovery response, and lower initial cost. However, substantially higher failure rates in initial procedures offset PTCA's savings to an unknown extent and cloud analysis of its overall impact. Lack of randomized clinical data precludes valid cost-effectiveness comparison of the technologies at this time. Criteria for establishing valid data and evaluations of currently available data are described in this paper.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty: Current Status and Future TrendsMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1986
- The Failure of Intravenous Digital Subtraction Angiography in Replacing Carotid ArteriographyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1986
- The role of before-after studies of therapeutic impact in the evaluation of diagnostic technologiesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting.BMJ, 1985
- Randomized trials in coronary bypass surgery.Circulation, 1985
- Comparative cost of myocardial revascularization: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgeryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1985
- Survival of medically treated patients in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) registry.Circulation, 1982
- The Veterans Administration Cooperative Study of stable angina: current status.Circulation, 1982
- Nonoperative Dilatation of Coronary-Artery StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and designBritish Journal of Cancer, 1976