Making Better use of Scientific Knowledge: Separating Truth from Justice
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 3 (2) , 80-87
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00002.x
Abstract
One major reason that scientific information is not often effectively applied in the formation of social policy is that available methods for coping with the uncertainty in scientific judgments are overlooked. Application of such methods is as necessary as reducing uncertainty through the acquisition of more knowledge for these methods result in the more effective use of knowledge already at hand. Furthermore, failure to cope with uncertainty through explicit, analytical methods results in failure to separate fact (truth) from value (justice), which in turn results in wasted knowledge and unnecessary dispute. We present four concrete examples of how such circumstances can be avoided.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Learning From an Acid Rain ProgramScience, 1991
- To See Ourselves As Others See UsScience, 1990
- Norms for Evaluating Regulatory Science1Risk Analysis, 1989
- The Greenhouse Effect: Science and PolicyScience, 1989
- Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: Implications for theory and measurement of performance.Psychological Bulletin, 1986
- THE CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONTROL STUDY: A CASE FOR MULTIOBJECTIVE PLANNING AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1984
- A field study of the fallibility of polygraphic lie detectionNature, 1984
- Statistical versus clinical lie detection.American Psychologist, 1981
- Science, Values, and Human JudgmentScience, 1976
- Some methodological considerations in multiple-cue probability studies.Psychological Review, 1964