The secularisation thesis: Talking at cross purposes
- 1 May 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Contemporary Religion
- Vol. 12 (2) , 159-179
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13537909708580797
Abstract
This article does not seek to argue for or against any aspect of the secularisation thesis. It argues that careful attention to the definition of terms, together with a division of existing arguments relating to the thesis into a “Broad Approach”; and a “Narrow Approach”; would greatly assist in the clarification and evaluation of arguments concerning the secularisation thesis. It argues further that it is vital for historical data to be correctly researched, handled and applied. The article concludes that there is a significant amount of confusion caused by the failure to define terms and apply historical data with care. This makes it difficult to make headway with the secularisation debate or to evaluate properly the alternative model of “Desacralisation”; (Stark & Iannaccone, 1994), so that theorists are often talking at cross purposes.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Religion in Britain at the close of the 20th century: A challenge to the silver lining perspectiveJournal of Contemporary Religion, 1996
- The Truth about Religion in BritainJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1995
- Truth? A Reply to BruceJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1995
- A Supply-Side Reinterpretation of the "Secularization" of EuropeJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1994
- Religion And ModernizationPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1992
- Reflections on a Many Sided ControversyPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1992
- A Revisionist Approach to Religious ChangePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1992
- Secularization and Census DataPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1992
- The Consequences of Religious Market StructureRationality and Society, 1991