A comparison of systematic errors between the Richards and Hammel methods of measuring tissue – water relations parameters
- 1 September 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Botany
- Vol. 56 (17) , 2153-2161
- https://doi.org/10.1139/b78-257
Abstract
The pressure bomb is being used to a much greater extent to measure some tissue – water relations parameters such as osmotic pressure, turgor pressure, and cell wall elasticity. Recently, Richards has developed a faster pressure-bomb method of obtaining these and other parameters than the method used by Hammel and modified by us. In this paper, we compare the two methods and conclude that Richards’ method should not be used when accuracy is deemed important. The Richards method usually overestimates osmotic pressure by 0.2 MPa (= 2 bars) and sometimes by 0.8 MPa (= 8 bars).Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The characteristics of seasonal and ontogenetic changes in the tissue – water relations of Acer, Populus, Tsuga, and PiceaCanadian Journal of Botany, 1978
- Resistance to water flow in Fagus grandifolia leavesCanadian Journal of Botany, 1977
- Some possible sources of error in determining bulk elastic moduli and other parameters from pressure–volume curves of shoots and leavesCanadian Journal of Botany, 1976
- Reversible Changes in the Hydraulic Permeability of Plant Cell MembranesPlant Physiology, 1964
- Rapid Changes in Permeability of Cell Membranes to Water Brought About by Carbon Dioxide & OxygenPlant Physiology, 1962