Evaluation of Aquatic Insect Emergence Traps1
- 1 October 1967
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Economic Entomology
- Vol. 60 (5) , 1255-1259
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/60.5.1255
Abstract
Performance of submerged and floating pyramidal-traps was compared with that of a new design, the staked box-trap for estimating the emergence of midges (Chironomidae and Chaoboridae) in waste-stabilization lagoons. The box-trap and pyramidal-traps collected similar numbers of midges, but the former was superior for servicing because, after a sliding base was inserted, adults could be killed and aspirated. This technique eliminated loss of adults. Submerged traps captured only 5% as many midges as did the surface traps. Field and laboratory results indicated that dear plastic traps catch more midges than black plastic traps of similar design and are therefore considered to give a more accurate estimate of emergence. Criteria for accurate estimation of emergence are discussed.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of the Catches of Emerging Aquatic Insects in Floating Box and Submerged Funnel TrapsJournal of Animal Ecology, 1963
- A Comparison of Sampling Techniques Utilized in an Ecological Study of Aquatic Insects1Journal of Economic Entomology, 1955
- A Study of the Population of Insects Emerging as Adults from the Dundas Marsh, Hamilton, Ontario, During 1948The American Midland Naturalist, 1953