Convention Quotas and Communal Representation
- 1 April 1977
- journal article
- other
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 7 (2) , 255-261
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400000958
Abstract
The 1972 Democratic National Convention operated under much-heralded reform rules requiring, in effect, ‘quotas’ of blacks, women and youth in state delegations. The goal of these reforms obviously relates to deep normative concerns – improving representation, ‘democratizing’ conventions, etc. Their success in realizing this goal is obviously an empirical question, and it is one which has attracted considerable academic attention. Among the myriad of commentators, Jeane Kirkpatrick boasts the richest data base and the most subtle theoretical model. Her conclusion is that the reforms were largely a failure, insofar as they did little to improve the representation of Democratic party opinion by Convention delegates. On that point the data speak for themselves. The question to be raised here is simply whether these data really speak to the full range of normative concerns that might motivate quota requirements. This comment will discuss two other goals that convention quotas might serve, quite apart from their impact on representation of opinion.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Representation in the American National Conventions: the Case of 1972British Journal of Political Science, 1975
- Convention Reform and Conventional Wisdom: An Empirical Assessment of Democratic Party ReformsPolitical Science Quarterly, 1974
- The Political Economy of Ethnic ChangeAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1974
- Changing the Rules Changes the Game: Party Reform and the 1972 California Delegation to the Democratic National ConventionAmerican Political Science Review, 1974
- Population Equality and the Distribution of Seats in the British House of CommonsComparative Politics, 1971
- Critique and comment: Proof of a theorem on majority ruleBehavioral Science, 1969
- Decision-Rules and Individual Values in Constitutional ChoiceAmerican Political Science Review, 1969
- Reynolds v. Sims Abroad: a Briton Compares Apportionment CriteriaThe Western Political Quarterly, 1969
- THE POLITICS OF REDISTRIBUTIONThe Political Quarterly, 1968
- The Redistribution of SeatsPublic Administration, 1955