Size and scaling of predator–prey dynamics
- 24 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Ecology Letters
- Vol. 9 (5) , 548-557
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00900.x
Abstract
We propose a scaled version of the Rosenzweig–MacArthur model using both Type I and Type II functional responses that incorporates the size dependence of interaction rates. Our aim is to link the energetic needs of organisms with the dynamics of interacting populations, for which survival is a result of a game‐theoretic struggle for existence. We solve the scaled model of predator–prey dynamics and predict population level characteristics such as the scaling of coexistence size ranges and the optimal predator–prey size ratio. For a broad class of such models, the optimal predator–prey size ratio given available prey of a fixed size is constant. We also demonstrate how scaling predictions of prey density differ under resource limitation vs. predator drawdown. Finally, we show how evolution of predator size can destabilize population dynamics, compare scaling of predator–prey cycles to previous work, as well as discuss possible extensions of the model to multispecies communities.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adaptive Evolution of Phytoplankton Cell SizeThe American Naturalist, 2005
- The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology from genomes to ecosystems: towards a quantitative unifying theory of biological structure and organizationJournal of Experimental Biology, 2005
- TOWARD A METABOLIC THEORY OF ECOLOGYEcology, 2004
- COMMENTARY ON BROWN ET AL.'S “TOWARD A METABOLIC THEORY OF ECOLOGY”Ecology, 2004
- Prey–predator size‐dependent functional response: derivation and rescaling to the real worldJournal of Animal Ecology, 2004
- Modelling universality and scalingNature, 2002
- Re-examination of the “3/4-law” of MetabolismJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2001
- Dynamics of Adaptation and Evolutionary BranchingPhysical Review Letters, 1997
- Cope's rule, the island rule and the scaling of mammalian population densityNature, 1993
- Body Size and Consumer-Resource DynamicsThe American Naturalist, 1992