It's time to challenge surgical dogma with evidence-based data
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 189 (2) , 423-427
- https://doi.org/10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00587-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electrocautery used to create incisions does not increase wound infection ratesThe American Journal of Surgery, 1994
- Comparative study of abdominal incision techniquesBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Effects of electrocautery on midline laparotomy wound infectionThe American Journal of Surgery, 1991
- A Prospective Study of Incisional Time, Blood Loss, Pain, and Healing With Carbon Dioxide Laser, Scalpel, and ElectrosurgeryArchives of Surgery, 1991
- Effect of electrocautery on wound healing in midline laparotomy incisionsThe American Journal of Surgery, 1990
- Wound infection after abdominal incision with scalpel or diathermyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1990
- Incisions with knife or diathermy and postoperative painBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Wound Healing of Skin Incisions Produced by Ultrasonically Vibrating Knife, Scalpel, Electrosurgery, and Carbon Dioxide LaserThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1988
- The Epidemiology of Wound Infection: A 10-Year Prospective Study of 62,939 WoundsSurgical Clinics of North America, 1980
- Studies in the management of the contaminated wound: IV. Resistance to infection of surgical wounds made by knife, electrosurgery, and laserThe American Journal of Surgery, 1970