Bowel function following insertion of self-expanding metallic stents for palliation of colorectal cancer
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Colorectal Disease
- Vol. 7 (3) , 251-253
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00765.x
Abstract
Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) are an important addition to the treatment of large bowel obstruction. The aim of this study was firstly to assess bowel function following SEMS placement and secondly to identify any potential factors which might aid in the prediction of technical failure of stent insertion. A review of all patients undergoing attempted SEMS placement for palliation of malignant left-sided colorectal obstruction over a four-year period (1st May 2000-30th April 2004) was performed. Twenty-one patients (12 male) with a median age of 76 years (range 48-92 years) were included, 11 with metastatic disease and 10 severe comorbidity. SEMS insertion was technically successful in 16 (76%) of 21 cases. Contrast successfully passed through the obstructing lesion in all 16 cases where SEMS placement was technically successful. It only passed through 1 of 5 cases where stenting was not possible (P = 0.0008, Fisher's Exact test). Complications included colonic perforation (1 case), stent migration (1 case) and tumour ingrowth requiring a second stent (1 case). Median survival after SEMS was 12 months (range 1-30 months), and 9 patients died during follow-up. Median bowel frequency following SEMS was 3.5 times per day (range 1-7). Eight patients always passed a liquid stool, 3 others regularly required laxatives and one further patient with poor function after stenting requested a defunctioning stoma. Failure of contrast to pass through the obstructing lesion may predict those cases where stenting will not be technically possible. Median survival following SEMS insertion is encouraging in this series, but bowel function is often poor. Expected bowel function should be discussed fully when consenting patients for a SEMS, particularly those with metastatic disease who are otherwise fit for resectional surgery.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incurable Colorectal Carcinoma: The Role of Surgical PalliationThe American Surgeon, 2004
- Comparison of stenting with emergency surgery as palliative treatment for obstructing primary left-sided colorectal cancer (Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1429–1433)British Journal of Surgery, 2004
- A comparison of two methods of palliation of large bowel obstruction due to irremovable colon cancer.The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2004
- Palliation for Advanced Malignant Colorectal Obstruction by Self-Expanding Metallic Stents: Prospective Evaluation of OutcomesDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2004
- Operative mortality in colorectal cancer: prospective national studyBMJ, 2003
- Comparison of stenting with emergency surgery as palliative treatment for obstructing primary left-sided colorectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Palliative therapy of colorectal carcinoma: stent or surgery?Colorectal Disease, 2003
- Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of colorectal stentsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Endoluminal stenting for relief of colonic obstruction is safe and effectiveColorectal Disease, 2000
- Malignant obstruction of the left colonBritish Journal of Surgery, 1994