Abstract
Confirmatory factor analyses supported the plausibility of a 10-factor model of the Revised Dimen- sions of Temperament Survey (DOTS-R; Windle & Lerner, 1986) with a sample of 975 teenagers. Simultaneous group models across gender indicated an invariant pattern for factor loadings and factor intercorrelations. Internal consistency estimates and test-retest stability were moderately high for the 10 temperament attributes, and consensual validity was indicated by convergent/dis- criminant correlations between adolescent and primary caregiver agreement indexes. A second- order factor analysis revealed 3 factors: Adaptability/Positive Affect, Attentional Focus, and Gen- eral Rhythmicity. In terms of levels of temperament, girls reported more adaptability/positive affect, whereas boys reported more attentional focus and general rhythmicity. The principal purpose of this study was to investigate the dimensional structure and psychometric characteristics (e.g., internal consistency, test-retest stability) of the Revised Di- mensions of Temperament Survey (DOTS-R; Windle & Lerner, 1986) with samples of midadolescent boys and girls (mean age = 15.5 years). Adolescence is often described as a phase in the life span involving confrontation with numerous challenges, psychosocial tasks, and novel events (e.g., Erikson, 1963; Havighurst, 1948/1972). The results of a study by New- comb, Huba, and Bentler (1981) indicated that middle adoles- cence was a peak period for the occurrence of stressful life events (also see Compas, 1987). Because high levels of stressful life events and novel demands characterize adolescence, it is important to identify individual difference attributes (e.g., tem- perament, coping styles) that may potentiate salubrious out- comes and attenuate or ameliorate nonsalubrious outcomes. Research reviewed by Garmezy and Rutter (1983) has sug- gested that temperament is one of three major variables asso- ciated with healthy, adaptive functioning among children grow- ing up under adverse circumstances (e.g., low socioeconomic status, parental alcoholism). Furthermore, the other two signifi- cant predictors of healthy, adaptive functioning were family support and external (community) support, both of which have been posed as influenced by temperament (e.g., Rutter, 1983; Werner, 1986). The temperament measure used in this study, the DOTS-R (Windle & Lerner, 1986), and its predecessor, the DOTS (Lerner, Palermo, Spiro, & Nesselroade, 1982), were developed for assessing age-continuous features of temperament identi- fied by Thomas and Chess (1977; Chess & Thomas, 1984) in their ongoing and highly influential New York Longitudinal

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: