Evidence‐based nursing: a stereotyped view of quantitative and experimental research could work against professional autonomy and authority

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Evidence‐based nursing: a stereotyped view of quantitative and experimental research could work against professional autonomy and authority In recent years, there have been calls within the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) for evidence‐based health care. These resonate with long‐standing calls for nursing to become a research‐based profession. Evidence‐based practice could enable nurses to demonstrate their unique contribution to health care outcomes, and support their seeking greater professionalization, in terms of enhanced authority and autonomy. Nursing’s professionalization project, and, within this, various practices comprising the ‘new nursing’, whilst sometimes not delivering all that was hoped of them, have been important in developing certain conditions conducive to developing evidence‐based practice, notably a critical perspective on practice and a reluctance merely to follow physicians’ orders. However, nursing has often been hesitant in its adoption of quantitative and experimental research. This hesitancy, it is argued, has been influenced by the propounding by some authors within the new nursing of a stereotyped view of quantitative/experimental methods which equates them with a number of methodological and philosophical points which are deemed, by at least some of these authors, as inimical to, or problematic within, nursing research. It is argued that, not only is the logic on which the various stereotyped views are based flawed, but further, that the wider influence of these viewpoints on nurses could lead to a greater marginalization of nurses in research and evidence‐based practice initiatives, thus perhaps leading to evidence‐based nursing being led by other groups. In the longer term, this might result in a form of evidence‐based nursing emphasizing routinization, thus — ironically — working against strategies of professional authority and autonomy embedded in the new nursing. Nursing research should instead follow the example of nurse researchers who already embrace multiple methods. While the paper describes United Kingdom experiences and debates, points raised about the importance of questioning stereotyped views of research should have international relevance.

This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit: