Alternatives to “Legalization”: Richer Views of Law and Politics
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Organization
- Vol. 55 (3) , 743-758
- https://doi.org/10.1162/00208180152507614
Abstract
The authors of “Legalization and World Politics” (International Organization, 54, 3, summer 2000) define “legalization” as the degree of obligation, precision, and delegation that international institutions possess. We argue that this definition is unnecessarily narrow. Law is a broad social phenomenon that is deeply embedded in the practices, beliefs, and traditions of societies. Understanding its role in politics requires attention to the legitimacy of law, to custom and law's congruence with social practice, to the role of legal rationality, and to adherence to legal processes, including participation in law's construction. We examine three applications of “legalization” offered in the volume and show how a fuller consideration of law's role in politics can produce concepts that are more robust intellectually and more helpful to empirical research.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Weak State, Strong Networks: The Institutional Dynamics of Foreign Direct Investment in China. Hongying WangThe China Journal, 2004
- Legalization as Strategy: The Asia-Pacific CaseInternational Organization, 2000
- Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and TransnationalInternational Organization, 2000
- The Concept of LegalizationInternational Organization, 2000
- Conclusion: The Causes and Consequences of LegalizationInternational Organization, 2000
- Hard and Soft Law in International GovernanceInternational Organization, 2000
- Why Do Nations Obey International Law?The Yale Law Journal, 1997
- Environmental Security and Freshwater Resources: Ecosystem Regime BuildingAmerican Journal of International Law, 1997
- Implicit lawLaw and Philosophy, 1994
- The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International LawInternational & Comparative Law Quarterly, 1989