THE CONTROL OF CERTAIN PLANT DISEASES WITH SULPHONAMIDES

Abstract
In in vitro tests, sulphanilamide was more toxic to plant pathogenic fungi than to bacterial plant pathogens, but sulphadiazine and other heterocyclic‐ring substituted compounds were more toxic to plant pathogenic bacteria than to fungi. When tested in vivo against a number of facultative plant parasites the sulphonamides were without effect except in providing slight control of Pseudomonas coronafaciens on oats. Against a number of obligate parasites including Uromyces fabae on broad beans and Puccinia triticina on wheat, the sulphonamides gave effective control when applied either through the roots or leaves. The minimal effective concentrations in the leaves of the more active compounds varied between 100–200 μg./g. fresh weight of leaf tissue.The sulphonamides are also toxic to higher plants and both the fungitoxic and phytotoxic effects could be reversed with p‐aminobenzoic acid.A number of sulphanilamides with acyl substituents on the p‐amino‐group were tested against P. triticina and were shown to control the disease with very slight phytotoxic damage. Control could be attributed to the release of ‘free’ sulphanilamide by hydrolysis within the plant.Two factors appear to control the systemic action of sulphonamides: first, the movement in the plant which results in the accumulation of effective concentrations in the leaves, and secondly, the specificity of a sulphonamide for a particular host‐parasite association.