Does Aggressive Surgery Only Benefit Patients With Less Advanced Ovarian Cancer? Results From an International Comparison Within the SCOTROC-1 Trial
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 23 (34) , 8802-8811
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.02.1287
Abstract
Purpose: Studies indicate that ovarian cancer patients who have been optimally debulked survive longer. Although chemotherapy has been variable, they have defined standards of care. Additionally, it is suggested that patients from the United Kingdom (UK) have inferior survival compared with some other countries. We explored this within the context of a large, international, prospective, randomized trial of first-line chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer (docetaxel-carboplatin v paclitaxel-carboplatin; SCOTROC-1). The Scottish Randomised Trial in Ovarian Cancer surgical study is a prospective observational study examining the impact on progression-free survival (PFS) of cytoreductive surgery and international variations in surgical practice. Patients and Methods: One thousand seventy-seven patients were recruited (UK, n = 689; Europe, United States, and Australasia, n = 388). Surgical data were available for 889 patients. These data were analyzed within a Cox model. Results: There were three main observations. First, more extensive surgery was performed in non-UK patients, who were more likely to be optimally debulked (≤ 2 cm residual disease) than UK patients (71.3% v 58.4%, respectively; P < .001). Second, optimal debulking was associated with increased PFS mainly for patients with less extensive disease at the outset (test for interaction, P = .003). Third, UK patients with no visible residual disease had a less favorable PFS compared with patients recruited from non-UK centers who were similarly debulked (hazard ratio = 1.85; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.97; P = .010). This observation seems to be related to surgical practice, primarily lymphadenectomy. Conclusion: Increased PFS associated with optimal surgery is limited to patients with less advanced disease, arguing for case selection rather than aggressive debulking in all patients irrespective of disease extent. Lymphadenectomy may have beneficial effects on PFS in optimally debulked patients.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Survival Effect of Maximal Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma During the Platinum Era: A Meta-AnalysisJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Long-Term SurvivalGynecologic Oncology, 1999
- Survival of European women with gynaecological tumours, during the period 1978–1989European Journal Of Cancer, 1998
- Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: four systematic meta-analyses of individual patient data from 37 randomized trialsBritish Journal of Cancer, 1998
- Primary debulking surgery in advanced ovarian carcinomaBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Primary Surgery in Ovarian Cancer: Current OpinionsAnnals of Medicine, 1995
- Meta-analysis of surgery in advanced ovarian carcinoma: Ismaximum cytoreductive surgery an independent determinant of prognosis?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1992
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking for advanced epithelial ovarian cancerGynecologic Oncology, 1991
- A meta-analysis of prognostic factors in advanced ovarian cancer with median survival and overall survival (measured with the log (relative risk)) as main objectivesEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1989
- Early clinical studies with cis-diammine-1,1-cyclobutane dicarboxylate platinum IICancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1982