Can Managerial Discretion Explain Observed Leverage Ratios?
Top Cited Papers
- 15 October 2003
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 17 (1) , 257-294
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhg036
Abstract
This article analyzes the impact of managerial discretion and corporate control mechanisms on leverage and firm value within a contingent claims model where the manager derives perquisites from investment. Optimal capital structure reflects both the tax advantage of debt less bankruptcy costs and the agency costs of managerial discretion. Actual capital structure reflects the trade-off made by the manager between his empire-building desires and the need to ensure sufficient efficiency to prevent control challenges. The model shows that manager-shareholder conflicts can explain the low debt levels observed in practice. It also examines the impact of these conflicts on the cross-sectional variation in capital structures.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- An EBIT‐Based Model of Dynamic Capital StructureThe Journal of Business, 2001
- Term Structures of Credit Spreads with Incomplete Accounting InformationEconometrica, 2001
- Pricing the strategic value of putable securities in liquidity crisesJournal of Financial Economics, 2001
- Debt Valuation, Renegotiation, and Optimal Dividend PolicyThe Review of Financial Studies, 2000
- Leverage and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Unsuccessful TakeoversThe Journal of Finance, 1999
- How Costly is Financial (Not Economic) Distress? Evidence from Highly Leveraged Transactions that Became DistressedThe Journal of Finance, 1998
- Managerial Entrenchment and Capital Structure DecisionsThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- What do firms do with cash windfalls?Journal of Financial Economics, 1994
- Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing PoliciesThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- Super contact and related optimality conditionsJournal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1991