Plate tectonics
- 1 July 1975
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Reviews of Geophysics
- Vol. 13 (3) , 326-332
- https://doi.org/10.1029/rg013i003p00326
Abstract
Plate tectonics as a theory distinct from, yet embracing, continental drift and sea floor spreading was formulated by Wilson [1965] when he described a continuous network of ridges, transforms, and subduction zones bounding large rigid plates. Wilson explicitly discussed many of the consequences of the relative motion of torsionally rigid plates such as the changing geometry of certain kinds of transform linkage between ridges and subduction zones, evolving mosaics of ridges, transforms, and subduction zones, and the changing area of plates. At about the same time, Bullard et al. [1965] made the implicit assumption of torsional rigidity in using finite difference rotation poles to fit together margins of the continents bordering the Atlantic Ocean. An earlier, little publicized naturally occurring example of rigid body rotation, although it is on a flat surface and therefore allows translation, is provided by Stanley's [1955] study of tracks on Racetrack Playa, California. Stanley showed that parallel and concentric stone tracks resulted from stones embedded in and protruding from the base of wind‐blown rigid ice floes. McKenzie and Parker [1967], using the relative motion of the North American and Pacific plates, outlined for the first time the theory and consequences of relative plate motion on a spherical surface by using vector circuits to describe the instantaneous behavior of triple junctions (a technique later fully developed by McKenzie and Morgan [1969] and instantaneous angular velocities about the rotation axes between three plates. In particular, they showed how triaxial strain fields derived from first‐motion studies may be used as a rough guide to relative plate motion and applied the useful practice of drawing Mercator maps about instantaneous rotation poles that describe relative motion between two plates. In the following year, Le Pichon [1968] and Morgan [1968] developed comprehensive models of instantaneous global plate kinematics, and Isacks et al. [1968] showed how worldwide first‐motion solutions accorded in a systematic way with a set of torsionally rigid lithosphere plates in relative motion.Keywords
This publication has 91 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Sheeted Dike Layer of the Betts Cove Ophiolite Complex does not Represent Spreading: DiscussionCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 1974
- An Astronomical Measurement of the Present-day Drift of the Eurasian and American PlatesGeophysical Journal International, 1974
- North American Paleozoic foldbelts and deformational histories; a plate tectonics anomaly?American Journal of Science, 1974
- ALPINE, MEDITERRANEAN, AND CENTRAL ATLANTIC MESOZOIC FACIES IN RELATION TO THE EARLY EVOLUTION OF THE TETHYSPublished by Society for Sedimentary Geology ,1974
- AULACOGENS AND THEIR GENETIC RELATION TO GEOSYNCLINES, WITH A PROTEROZOIC EXAMPLE FROM GREAT SLAVE LAKE, CANADAPublished by Society for Sedimentary Geology ,1974
- Continental Margins and Ophiolite Obduction: Appalachian Caledonian SystemPublished by Springer Nature ,1974
- Evidence for plate-tectonic regimes in the rock recordAmerican Journal of Science, 1972
- The N Plate Problem of Plate TectonicsGeophysical Journal International, 1972
- Structural framework and evolution of the southern part of the Cordilleran orogen, western United StatesAmerican Journal of Science, 1972
- Macquarie ridge-New Zealand alpine fault transitionPublished by Wiley ,1972