Occupational noise exposure and ischaemic heart disease mortality
- 15 August 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Vol. 63 (12) , 813-819
- https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2005.026245
Abstract
To investigate the hypothesis that long term exposure to excessive noise can increase the risk of ischaemic heart disease. A case-control design, nested within a cohort of nuclear power workers employed at two sites in England over the period 1950-98, was used. Cases were men who died from ischaemic heart disease (ICD-9: 410-414) aged 75 or under; each was matched to a surviving control of the nearest age who joined the same site at the same time. Personal noise exposure was assessed retrospectively for each man by hygienists using (1) company work histories, (2) noise survey records from 1965-98, and (3) judgements about likely use of hearing protection devices. Men were classified into four groups according to their cumulative exposure to noise, with men whose exposure at the company never exceeded 85dB(A) for at least one year being considered "unexposed". Risks were compared via odds ratios (ORs) using conditional logistic regression and adjusted for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, height, BMI, and smoking, as measured at recruitment to the company. Analysis was based on 1101 case-control pairs. There was little difference between the exposure groups at recruitment. There was no evidence of increased risk at site A: the ORs for ischaemic heart disease mortality among low, medium, and high exposure categories, compared to unexposed men, being 1.04, 1.00, and 0.77. The corresponding ORs (95% CIs) at site B were 1.15 (0.81-1.65) 1.45 (1.02-2.06), and 1.37 (0.96-1.96). When the comparison was confined to men with at least five years of employment, these dropped to 1.07 (0.64-1.77), 1.33 (0.88-2.01), and 1.21 (0.82-1.79) respectively. The authors did not find statistically robust evidence of increased risk but the estimates at site B are consistent with those in a major cohort study. A strength of the present study is that the validity of noise estimation at site B has been demonstrated elsewhere.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predictive validity of a retrospective measure of noise exposureOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2006
- Traffic Noise and Risk of Myocardial InfarctionEpidemiology, 2005
- Surveillance of noise exposure in the Danish workplace: a baseline surveyOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2004
- Retrospective Noise Estimates for British Nuclear Workers Using an Alternative ApproachAnnals of Occupational Hygiene, 2004
- Confounding and confoundersOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2003
- Noise exposure and public health.Environmental Health Perspectives, 2000
- Uncertainty in the Relation between Exposure to Magnetic Fields and Brain Cancer due to Assessment and Assignment of Exposure and Analytical Methods in Dose‐Response ModelingAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1999
- Traffic Noise and Cardiovascular Risk: The Caerphilly and Speedwell Studies, Third Phase-10-Year Follow UpArchives of environmental health, 1999
- Length of occupational noise exposure and blood pressureInternationales Archiv für Arbeitsmedizin, 1992
- Cardiovascular diseases and the work environment. A critical review of the epidemiologic literature on nonchemical factors.Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 1989