Narcotrend Monitoring Allows Faster Emergence and a Reduction of Drug Consumption in Propofol–Remifentanil Anesthesia
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 99 (1) , 34-41
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200307000-00009
Abstract
Background: The Narcotrend is a new electroencephalographic monitor designed to measure depth of anesthesia, based on a six-letter classification from A (awake) to F (increasing burst suppression) including 14 substages. This study was designed to investigate the impact of Narcotrend monitoring on recovery times and propofol consumption in comparison to Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring or standard anesthetic practice. Methods: With institutional review board approval and written informed consent, 120 adult patients scheduled to undergo minor orthopedic surgery were randomized to receive a propofol-remifentanil anesthetic controlled by Narcotrend, by BIS(R), or solely by clinical parameters. Anesthesia was induced with 0.4 micro x kg-1 x min-1 remifentanil and a propofol target-controlled infusion at 3.5 microg/ml. After intubation, remifentanil was reduced to 0.2 micro x kg-1 x min-1, whereas the propofol infusion was adjusted according to clinical parameters or to the following target values: during maintenance to D(0) (Narcotrend) or 50 (BIS); 15 min before the end of surgery to C(1) (Narcotrend) or 60 (BIS). Recovery times were recorded by a blinded investigator, and average normalized propofol consumption was calculated from induction and maintenance doses. Results: The groups were comparable for demographic data, duration of anesthesia, and mean remifentanil dosages. Compared with standard practice, patients with Narcotrend or BIS monitoring needed significantly less propofol (standard practice, 6.8 +/- 1.2 mg x kg-1 x h-1 vs. Narcotrend, 4.5 +/- 1.1 mg x kg-1 x h-1 or BIS(R), 4.8 +/- 1.0 mg x kg-1 x h-1; P < 0.001), opened their eyes earlier (9.3 +/- 5.2 vs. 3.4 +/- 2.2 or 3.5 +/- 2.9 min), and were extubated sooner (9.7 +/- 5.3 vs. 3.7 +/- 2.2 or 4.1 +/- 2.9 min). Conclusions: The results indicate that Narcotrend and BIS monitoring are equally effective to facilitate a significant reduction of recovery times and propofol consumption when used for guidance of propofol titration during a propofol-remifentanil anesthetic.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of Bispectral Index Monitoring on End-Tidal Gas Concentration and Recovery Duration After Outpatient AnesthesiaAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2001
- The Effect of Bispectral Index Monitoring on Anesthetic Use and Recovery in Children Anesthetized with Sevoflurane in Nitrous OxideAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2001
- Clinical impact of hypnotic-titration guidelines based on EEG Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring during routine anesthetic careJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 2000
- The Effect of Remifentanil on the Bispectral Index Change and Hemodynamic Responses After Orotracheal IntubationAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2000
- The Effect of the Interaction of Propofol and Alfentanil on Recall, Loss of Consciousness, and the Bispectral IndexAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1998
- Electroencephalographic Derivatives as a Tool for Predicting the Depth of Sedation and Anesthesia Induced by SevofluraneAnesthesiology, 1998
- Bispectral Analysis of the Electroencephalogram Predicts Conscious Processing of Information during Propofol Sedation and HypnosisAnesthesiology, 1998
- Bispectral Index Monitoring Allows Faster Emergence and Improved Recovery from Propofol, Alfentanil, and Nitrous Oxide AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 1997
- Bispectral Analysis Measures Sedation and Memory Effects of Propofol, Midazolam, Isoflurane, and Alfentanil in Healthy VolunteersAnesthesiology, 1997
- Electroencephalogram Bispectral Analysis Predicts the Depth of Midazolam-induced SedationAnesthesiology, 1996