SECONDARY URETEROSCOPY: RESULTS AND MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AT A REFERRAL CENTER
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 159 (1) , 52-55
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64010-2
Abstract
Purpose: In an era when extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy occupies a dominant place in the treatment of urolithiasis ureteroscopy retains an important role in certain circumstances. While often a definitive procedure, ureteroscopy can be associated with potential risks and complications. The treatment of patients who have undergone a failed attempt at ureteroscopic stone retrieval or have a complication may be complex. As a tertiary care stone referral center we review our experience with performing salvage ureteroscopy following a previous unsuccessful attempt at endoscopic stone removal. Materials and Methods: Between May 1990 and February 1996, 79 patients were referred following an unsuccessful attempt at retrograde endoscopic or basket manipulation for ureteral calculi. A retrospective review of the outcomes of these patients was conducted. Of the patients 11 presented with associated complications, which included ureteral perforation [4] , intramural false passage [1] and fever or sepsis [6] . Complications were managed by early establishment of urinary tract drainage by stenting or nephrostomy. Among patients without complications elective salvage ureteroscopy was performed. Results: Ureteroscopy was used in 79 patients with a successful outcome (stone-free) in 75 (95%). Followup imaging with renal ultrasound or excretory urography at least 3 months after secondary ureteroscopy was available in 65 patients and showed no evidence of hydronephrosis or delayed stricture formation. Conclusions: Treating the patient who undergoes a failed attempt at ureteroscopy may be problematic and requires access to a wide array of endourological equipment. Each subsequent treatment should be individualized with consideration given to stone size, location and general health. In the presence of a ureteral injury establishment of early urinary tract drainage is essential. Following stabilization, secondary ureteroscopy can be performed yielding high stone-free rates with minimal complications.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- CONTEMPORARY MANAGEMENT OF URETERAL STONESUrologic Clinics of North America, 1997
- The case for primary endoscopic management of upper urinary tract calculi: I. A critical review of 121 extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy failuresUrology, 1995
- Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones Using the Dornier Lithotriptor MFL5000Urologia Internationalis, 1994
- Ureteroscopy for lower ureteral stonesUrology, 1993
- Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Situ or after Push-Up for Upper Ureteral Calculi: A Prospective Randomized TrialJournal of Urology, 1993
- Cost and Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Lower Ureteral CalculiJournal of Urology, 1992
- Lumbar ureteric stones: Which is the best treatment?Urology, 1991
- UreteroscopyJournal of Urology, 1988
- Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones: A Retrospective Analysis of 417 CasesJournal of Urology, 1988
- Ureteral Perforation During Ureterorenoscopy: Treatment and ManagementJournal of Urology, 1987