CARBON DIOXIDE PRODUCTION IN SANDS AND SOILS IN THE PRESENCE AND ABSENCE OF AMOEBAE
- 1 August 1929
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Annals of Applied Biology
- Vol. 16 (3) , 472-482
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1929.tb07626.x
Abstract
Summary.: Experiments are described on carbon dioxide production from soil and sand cultures containing a species of bacterium with and without amoebae. The following results were obtained: Carbon dioxide production and bacterial numbers are correlated provided that amoebae are not present, or are present in very small numbers. The bacteria are more efficient as producers of carbon dioxide when their numbers are not rising and less efficient when their numbers are increasing. This does not hold for young cultures. Also each bacterium becomes less efficient as the density of the population increases. The amoebae cause a decrease in carbon dioxide production in sands containing peptone, but an increase in sands containing mineral salt solution with glucose or soil extractKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Qualitative and Quantitative Effects of Food on the Growth of A Soil Amoeba (Hartmanella Hyalina)Journal of Experimental Biology, 1927
- Principles of Soil MicrobiologyTransactions of the American Microscopical Society, 1927
- Principles of soil microbiology, by Selman A. Waksman.Published by Smithsonian Institution ,1927
- INFLUENCE OF PROTOZOA ON THE PROCESS OF NITROGEN FIXATION BY AZOTOBACTER CHROOCOCCUMAnnals of Applied Biology, 1926
- MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF SOIL AS AN INDEX OF SOIL FERTILITYSoil Science, 1924
- VII.—A quantitative investigation of the bacterial and protozoan population of the soil, with an account of the protozoan faunaPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character, 1923
- THE OXIDIZING POWER OF SOIL FROM LIMED AND UNLIMED PLOTS AND ITS RELATION TO OTHER FACTORSSoil Science, 1920
- The Atmosphere of the Soil: Its Composition and the Causes of VariationThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1915