Prey capture kinematics of ant-eating lizards
Open Access
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Journal of Experimental Biology
- Vol. 208 (1) , 113-127
- https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01345
Abstract
While morphological and behavioral feeding specializations are obvious in many vertebrate groups, among lizards there appear to be few dietary specialists. By comparing the prey capture kinematics and overall feeding behavior in two highly specialized ant-eating lizards (Moloch horridus and Phrynosoma platyrhinos) with those of two closely related dietary generalists (Pogona vitticeps and Uma notata), we investigate whether dietary specialization has been accompanied by changes in the function and use of the feeding system. We quantified kinematic variables from high-speed video recordings (200-250 frames s-1) of each species feeding on ants. Prey capture was strikingly different in M. horridus to that of other species, being characterized by a suite of unusual behaviors including the lack of a body lunge, faster tongue protrusion, reduced prey processing and, most notably, the ability to modulate the slow open phase of the gape cycle. In concert, these traits make a single feeding event in M. horridus faster than that in any other iguanian lizard studied to date. Prey capture behavior in P. platyrhinos is kinematically more similar to U. notata and P. vitticeps than to M. horridus, but the ant specialists are similar in that both lack distinct prey processing behaviors, resulting in faster overall capture and feeding events. While ant feeding in P. vitticeps is faster than feeding on other prey, the duration of a single feeding event is still four times longer than in either ant specialist, because of extensive prey processing. Additionally, a phylogenetic comparison of ant specialist lizards with dietary generalists revealed that ant-eating lizards require significantly less time to capture and process prey. Thus there are not only significant behavioral modifications in these ant-eating lizards, but also multiple strategies among specialists, suggesting differing selective pressures or phylogenetic constraints in the evolution of ant eating in lizards.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- History and the Global Ecology of Squamate ReptilesThe American Naturalist, 2003
- Prey Capture Behavior in the Blue-Tongued Skink, Tiliqua scincoidesJournal of Herpetology, 1999
- Prey capture in the lizard Agama stellioJournal of Morphology, 1995
- Kinematic analysis of tongue movements during chemosensory behaviour in the European green lizard, Lacerta viridis (Reptilia: Lacertidae)Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1992
- Kinematics of prey processing in Chamaeleo jacksonii: conservation of function with morphological specializationJournal of Zoology, 1992
- Kinematics of prey capture and chewing in the lizard Agama agama (squamata: Agamidae)Journal of Morphology, 1991
- Comparative kinematic analysis of prey capture in Anolis carolinensis (iguania) and Lacerta viridis (scleroglossa)Journal of Experimental Zoology, 1990
- Functional and evolutionary morphology of lingual feeding in squamate reptiles: phylogenetics and kinematicsJournal of Zoology, 1989
- Tongues, tentacles and trunks: the biomechanics of movement in muscular-hydrostatsZoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1985
- The use of the tongue and hyoid apparatus during feeding in lizards (Ctenosaura similisandTupinambis nigropunctatus)Journal of Zoology, 1984