Discordance between ambulatory monitoring and programmed stimulation in assessing efficacy of class IA antiarrhythmic agents in patients with ventricular tachycardia
- 1 September 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 6 (3) , 539-544
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80110-8
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic assessment of survivors of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation with ambulatory monitoringThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- Long-term survival of patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmia treated with antiarrhythmic drugsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1982
- Role of programmed stimulation in assessing vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmiasAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- Management of patients at high risk of sudden deathAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Electrophysiologic approach to therapy of recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1979
- Sudden cardiac death: The major challenge confronting contemporary cardiologyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1979
- Recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia 3. Role of the electrophysiologic study in selection of antiarrhythmic regimens.Circulation, 1978
- Electrode-catheter arrhythmia induction in the selection and assessment of antiarrhythmic drug therapy for recurrent ventricular tachycardia.Circulation, 1978
- Cardiac pacing and pacemakers II. Serial electrophysiologic-pharmacologic testing for control of recurrent tachyarrhythmiasAmerican Heart Journal, 1977