Abstract
Continuing the experiments on the action of Gibberellic acid on growth and development of herbaceous plants, the Authors have examined once more several species which require “long day” for espletion of some phases of their reproductive development. The principal aim was to bring into evidence whether Gibberellic acid can really substitute for some manifestations of the reproductive development itself, or whether some apparent manifestations of reproductive development provoked by this substance are due primarily to modifications of vegetative processes determinated by it. The experiments were carried out on Papaver somniferum L., Centaurea calcitrapa L., Oenothera acaulis L., Aethusa Cynapium L. and Myosurus minimus L. Results obtained on Papaver somniferum demonstrate that Gibberellic acid accelerates the macroscopic flowering manifestations under short day conditions of plants already induced to flowering, substituting in this for the effect of “long day” factor in so far as concerns the lengthening of the floral axis. No experiments which can establish whether Gibberellic acid may have an action on specific processes involved in the transition to the reproductive stage, have so far been conducted on Papaver. Experiments on Centaurea calcitrapa have revealed that Gibberellic acid, treatment though promoting in plants manteined in short-day conditions a “bolting” effect simulating that obtained usually only at long-day, does not succeed in flowering this is true in our experimental conditions (experiments limit: 10 weeks; (photo-phase at light intensity inferior to 2000 lux). Experiments on Centaurea were also supplemented with histological observation of esperimental material. In the experiments on Oenothera acaulis, a long-day plant only for the macroscopic development phase of floral apparatus, and indeterminate for the formation of floral primordia, has been noted that Gibb. acid can, in the long run, partly substitute for the long-day effect. However, development of floral structures at shortday, is more easily obtained if the plants are supplied, besides with Gibberellic acid, also with other stimulating and trophic substances. This and others observations may indicate that Gibberellic acid represent only one of the substances involved in the metabolism of plants under long-day conditions. Aethusa Cynapium has furnished results similar to those obtained with Centaurea, even if within very long experimental limits some apparently indirect action of Gibberellic acid towards flowering may occurs. Preliminary experimental data on logday Myosurus minimus L. show that Gibberellic acid can substitute sooner or later for longday requirements in flowering. In fact, two months old plants flower when Gibberellic acid is supplied under 9 hr. shortday conditions while the controls in shorday remain vegetative. We must note that Myosurus flowers better when light extension is prevalently constituted by far red radiation the effect of which is apparently substituted more easily by Gibberellic acid even if its action appears less afficient and rapid than that of supplementary illumination.