Militancy, Unionism, and Gender Ideology
- 1 May 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Work and Occupations
- Vol. 16 (2) , 137-152
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888489016002002
Abstract
Two general explanations have been used by sociologists to account for the increase in industrial conflict involving nurses. The first focuses on changes in the organization of nursing work and argues that the profession has undergone a process of proletarianization. The second emphasizes changes in sex roles and gender ideologies among women. Both explanations argue that these historical developments are reflected in existing inequalities among nurses and that these inequalities are linked with industrial militancy. This article reviews these explanations and empirically evaluates the second in a study of hospital nurses. The results indicate support for the gender explanation. The implications of the findings are then related to the position of nursing in the medical division of labor.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attitudinal Militancy Amongst Australian NursesAustralian Journal of Social Issues, 1984
- The Sex Factor in Occupational ChoiceJournal of Sociology, 1982
- The Union Impact on Hospital Wages and Fringe BenefitsILR Review, 1982
- The Growth of Trade Union Consciousness among General Hospital Nurses Viewed as a Response to ‘Proletarianisation’Sociological Review, 1977
- Comparative analysis of Black women's and White women's sex-role attitudes.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975
- Health Worker Strikes: Social and Economic Bases of ConflictInternational Journal of Health Services, 1975
- Hospital Workers: Class Conflicts in the MakingInternational Journal of Health Services, 1975
- Labor and Monopoly CapitalMonthly Review, 1974
- Determinants of Attitudinal Militancy among Nurses and TeachersILR Review, 1974
- Witches, Midwives, and NursesMonthly Review, 1973