CHANGES IN A MULTIPLE‐RESPONSE REPERTOIRE DURING RESPONSE‐CONTINGENT PUNISHMENT AND RESPONSE RESTRICTION: SEQUENTIAL RELATIONSHIPS
- 1 January 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 37 (1) , 123-133
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-123
Abstract
A multiple-response baseline of four activities was established using gerbils as subjects. When one of the baseline responses was punished (Experiment 1) or restricted (Experiments 2 and 3), only the most probable of the alternative baseline responses increased. The response most likely to follow the punished or restricted responses during baseline sessions was also suppressed during subsequent punishment or response-restriction treatment.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- On categories of behavior and control groups in multiple-response proceduresLearning & Behavior, 1979
- Comments on paper by DunhamLearning & Behavior, 1979
- Changes in unpunished responding during response-contingent punishmentLearning & Behavior, 1978
- The temporal triangle: Response substitution in instrumental conditioning.Psychological Review, 1978
- Inhibitory interactions between appetitive and aversive stimuli.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- Pain-elicited aggression in the squirrel monkey: An implicit avoidance contingencyLearning & Behavior, 1976
- A motivational view of learning, performance, and behavior modification.Psychological Review, 1974
- SOME EFFECTS OF PUNISHMENT UPON UNPUNISHED RESPONDING1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972
- Punishment: Method and theory.Psychological Review, 1971
- Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning.Psychological Review, 1970