DNA Damage in the Nucleosome Core Is Refractory to Repair by Human Excision Nuclease
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Vol. 20 (24) , 9173-9181
- https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.20.24.9173-9181.2000
Abstract
To investigate the effect of nucleosomes on nucleotide excision repair in humans, we prepared a mononucleosome containing a (6-4) photoproduct in the nucleosome core and examined its repair with the reconstituted human excision nuclease system and with cell extracts. Nucleosomal DNA is repaired at a rate of about 10% of that for naked DNA in both systems. These results are in agreement with in vivo data showing a considerably slower rate of repair of overall genomic DNA relative to that for transcriptionally active DNA. Furthermore, our results indicate that the first-order packing of DNA in nucleosomes is a primary determinant of slow repair of DNA in chromatin.Keywords
This publication has 91 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human Damage-specific DNA-binding Protein p48Published by Elsevier ,2000
- The “Dark Side” of Chromatin RemodelingCell, 1999
- Synthesis and Nucleosome Structure of DNA Containing a UV Photoproduct at a Specific SiteBiochemistry, 1999
- DNA EXCISION REPAIRAnnual Review of Biochemistry, 1996
- Chromatin Structure of the Yeast URA3 Gene at High Resolution Provides Insight into Structure and Positioning of Nucleosomes in the Chromosomal ContextJournal of Molecular Biology, 1996
- Reconstitution of Human DNA Repair Excision Nuclease in a Highly Defined SystemJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1995
- Biochemical heterogeneity in xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group EMutation Research/DNA Repair, 1992
- UV damage-specific DNA-binding protein in xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group EBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1991
- Site-specific DNA repair at the nucleosome level in a yeast minichromosomeCell, 1990
- (6–4)Photoproducts are removed from the DNA of UV-irradiated mammalian cells more efficiently than cyclobutane pyrimidine dimersMutation Research Letters, 1985