Acalculous gall-bladder disease
- 1 March 1973
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 60 (3) , 213-215
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800600312
Abstract
A prospective study of 130 consecutive unselected patients submitted to cholecystectomy for biliary disease has been made. Nineteen patients (14.6 per cent) were found to have acalculous gall-bladder disease. The clinical history of these patients did not differ significantly from those with calculous disease, whilst the radiological and histopathological findings in this group were variable. Eleven of these 19 patients were completely relieved of their symptoms by surgery and it appeared that cholecystectomy was most successful in the patients with a history of either severe pain or previous acute cholecystitis. It is concluded that chronic gall-bladder disease may be acalculous and that, despite the lack of a homogeneous pathological background, surgery is of considerable value in a high proportion of such cases.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adenomyomatosis as A source of error in the diagnosis of gall-bladder diseaseBritish Journal of Surgery, 1970
- Acalculous cholecystitisThe American Journal of Surgery, 1967
- Clinicla Significance of Primary Hyperplasia of Gallbladder MucosaAnnals of Surgery, 1967
- Acute cholecystitis without gallbladder stonesThe American Journal of Surgery, 1966
- SYMPTOMS OF GALLBLADDER DISEASE WITH A NEGATIVE CHOLECYSTOGRAMThe Lancet, 1963
- Adenomyomatosis of the Gall-bladderThe British Journal of Radiology, 1961
- Cholecystitis glandularis proliferansBritish Journal of Surgery, 1957
- The Acalculous GallbladderAnnals of Surgery, 1956
- Cholecystitis without stone an investigation of 264 operated cases from the clinical, radiological, and pathological aspects. An attempt to determine the factors of service in estimating prognosisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1934
- Cholecystitis, the Cholesterol Gall-Bladder, and Silent Gall StonesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1927